Statistics

Christian Weber Internentdienste | All about coding

www.cw-internetdienste.de/

Some of you might know the problem: You have to store a dynamic array of values in your database. But whatâ€™s the fastest solution on the php side? Whatâ€™ ...

Cw-internetdienste.de

Conversion Technology Metas Server

Cw-internetdienste.de is hosted in Germany . Cw-internetdienste.de uses HTTPS protocol. Number of used technologies: 7. First technologies: CSS, Html, Javascript, Number of used javascripts: 54. First javascripts: Jquery.js, Jquery-migrate.min.js, S3slider.js, Number of used analytics tools: 1. First analytics tools: Google Analytics, Number of used plugins, modules: 4. Its server type is: Apache. Its CMS is: Wordpress.

Technologies in use by Cw-internetdienste.de

Technology

Number of occurences: 7

CSS
Html
Javascript
jQuery
Php
Pingback
Swf Object

Javascripts

Number of occurences: 54

jquery.js
jquery-migrate.min.js
s3slider.js
respond.js
jquery.ui.js
quicksand.js
caroufredsel.js
imagesloaded.js
waypoints.js
page.js
shCore.js
shBrushCSharp.js
shBrushPhp.js
shBrushJScript.js
shBrushJava.js
shBrushVb.js
shBrushSql.js
shBrushXml.js
shBrushDelphi.js
shBrushPython.js
shBrushRuby.js
shBrushCss.js
shBrushCpp.js
shBrushAS3.js
shBrushBash.js
shBrushColdFusion.js
shBrushClojure.js
shBrushDiff.js
shBrushErlang.js
shBrushFSharp.js
shBrushGroovy.js
shBrushJavaFX.js
shBrushLatex.js
shBrushMatlabKey.js
shBrushObjC.js
shBrushPerl.js
shBrushPlain.js
shBrushPowerShell.js
shBrushR.js
shBrushScala.js
comment-reply.min.js

Content Management System

Number of occurences: 1

Wordpress

Analytics

Number of occurences: 1

Google Analytics

Server Type

Apache

Used plugins, modules

Number of plugins and modules: 4

s3slider plugin
wp spamfree
google syntax highlighter
syntaxhighlighter

Conversion rate optimization
Clickable call number	Not founded!
Conversion form (contact form, subcriber)	Not founded!
Clickable email	Founded!
CTA (call to action) button	Founded!
List	Founded!
Image	Not founded!
Enhancement	Not founded!
Responsive website	Founded!
Facebook sharing	Not founded!
Google+ sharing	Not founded!
Twitter sharing	Not founded!
Linkedin sharing	Not founded!
Blog on the webiste	Not founded!

HTTPS (SSL) - Cw-internetdienste.de

SSL certificate

name: /OU=GT60799501/OU=See www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps (c)14/OU=Domain Control Validated - RapidSSL(R)/CN=*.your-server.de
subject:
- OU:
  - 0: GT60799501
  - 1: See www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps (c)14
  - 2: Domain Control Validated - RapidSSL(R)
- CN: *.your-server.de
hash: dcff5628
issuer:
- C: US
- O: GeoTrust Inc.
- CN: RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3
version: 2
serialNumber: 37745
validFrom: 141110135116Z
validTo: 181104040703Z
validFrom_time_t: 1415627476
validTo_time_t: 1541304423
extensions:
- authorityKeyIdentifier: keyid:C3:9C:F3:FC:D3:46:08:34:BB:CE:46:7F:A0:7C:5B:F3:E2:08:CB:59
- authorityInfoAccess: OCSP - URI:http://gv.symcd.com CA Issuers - URI:http://gv.symcb.com/gv.crt
- keyUsage: Digital Signature, Key Encipherment
- extendedKeyUsage: TLS Web Server Authentication, TLS Web Client Authentication
- subjectAltName: DNS:*.your-server.de, DNS:your-server.de
- crlDistributionPoints: Full Name: URI:http://gv.symcb.com/gv.crl
- basicConstraints: CA:FALSE
- certificatePolicies: Policy: 2.16.840.1.113733.1.7.54 CPS: https://www.rapidssl.com/legal

Meta - Cw-internetdienste.de

Number of occurences: 6

Name:
Content: http://cw-internetdienste.de/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/images/default-user-image.png
Name: viewport
Content: width=device-width, maximum-scale=1.0
Name: description
Content: Some of you might know the problem: You have to store a dynamic array of values in your database. But whatâ€™s the fastest solution on the php side? Whatâ€™s better
Name: twitter:card
Content: summary
Name: twitter:description
Content: Some of you might know the problem: You have to store a dynamic array of values in your database. But whatâ€™s the fastest solution on the php side? Whatâ€™s better for the database? Any more pros and cons? I did a bit of testing and came to conclusion that json is the way to go, if you have to store an array as value to your database. Â Â I tested both with an multidimensional array consisting of 3 layers and 5 values on each layer. The last layer has random strings that have 6 chars each. I repeated the test 50 times. Here are my results: serialize()vsjson_encode() The serialize() function needed about 76% longer than json_encode(). While serialize() needed around 0.064 ms, json_encode() did it in only 0.036 ms. unserialize()vsjson_decode() The unserialize() function was 21% faster than json_decode(). While unserialize() needed only 0.067 ms, json_decode() did need 0.085ms. So the serialize functions seem to need around the same time to serialize/unserialize, but jsons
Name: generator
Content: WordPress 4.2.10

Server / Hosting

IP: 188.40.30.87
Latitude: 51.30
Longitude: 9.49
Country: Germany

Rname

ns1.your-server.de
ns3.second-ns.de
ns.second-ns.com
mail.cw-internetdienste.de

Target

postmaster.your-server.de

HTTP Header Response

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:01:12 GMT Server: Apache X-Pingback: http://cw-internetdienste.de/xmlrpc.php Location: http://cw-internetdienste.de/ Content-Length: 0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 X-Cache: MISS from s_wx1011 Via: 1.1 s_wx1011 (squid/3.5.20) Connection: keep-alive HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:01:13 GMT Server: Apache X-Pingback: http://cw-internetdienste.de/xmlrpc.php Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 X-Cache: MISS from s_wx1011 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Via: 1.1 s_wx1011 (squid/3.5.20) Connection: keep-alive